Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1995, a group of key organisations and service providers from around the world met in Barcelona in association with the European Association of Palliative Care meeting. At that time the 'Barcelona Declaration' was put together. A decade on, at the 2nd Global Summit of National Palliative Care & Hospice Associations held in Seoul, Korea, a subsequent Declaration has been put in place. This broadens the concepts captured in the 1995 Declaration. It provides a framework for governments and health funding organisations around the world in which they need to work in order to ensure adequate access to palliative care.This document is an important step forward in placing palliative care firmly on the agenda of all health services across the world, acknowledging local resourcing limitations but suggesting in clear terms that palliative care is a clinical service that needs to be grown alongside other services universally.The Committee chaired by Sharon Baxter from Canada worked with the organisations represented at the Seoul meeting to put together this important Declaration. Please ensure that your governments, funders and health authorities are aware of the breadth of this. It is a useful document to provide to health services who have little insight into palliative care and the benefits that can be achieved through good palliation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".