Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1995, a group of key organisations and service providers from around the world met in Barcelona in association with the European Association of Palliative Care meeting. At that time the 'Barcelona Declaration' was put together. A decade on, at the 2nd Global Summit of National Palliative Care & Hospice Associations held in Seoul, Korea, a subsequent Declaration has been put in place. This broadens the concepts captured in the 1995 Declaration. It provides a framework for governments and health funding organisations around the world in which they need to work in order to ensure adequate access to palliative care.This document is an important step forward in placing palliative care firmly on the agenda of all health services across the world, acknowledging local resourcing limitations but suggesting in clear terms that palliative care is a clinical service that needs to be grown alongside other services universally.The Committee chaired by Sharon Baxter from Canada worked with the organisations represented at the Seoul meeting to put together this important Declaration. Please ensure that your governments, funders and health authorities are aware of the breadth of this. It is a useful document to provide to health services who have little insight into palliative care and the benefits that can be achieved through good palliation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".