MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1989873889 · doi:10.1086/421370

Discovery of a Huge Young Stellar Object Interaction Region in Camelopardalis

2004· article· en· W1989873889 on OpenAlexaff
M. L. McCall, R. Buta, T. Foster, W. K. Huchtmeier, J. P. Huchra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsNebulaYoung stellar objectMilky WayAstronomyStarsGalaxyPlumeSkySpectral energy distributionThick diskStar formationHalo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the course of a wide-field VI survey of galaxies in the IC 342/Maffei Group, a large nebula, which looks like an inclined disk with a jetlike plume emerging from it, was discovered in Camelopardalis. The object is most prominent in I . The predominating disk component is 6 8 across, which corresponds to 4.0 ± 1.6 pc at the estimated distance of 2.0 ± 0.8 kpc (the Perseus Arm). The plume extends 3 8 (2.2 pc) outward from the core along a direction that is about 20° from the minor axis of the disk. The disk lies along the edge of a filament of dust and molecular gas in the Milky Way. The plume points toward the core of the filament. No large-scale emission is seen at Hα, and the nebula is invisible in Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) images. About 30'' from the center of the disk is IRAS 04261+6339, which is a pair of unresolved Hα sources whose IRAS colors and spectra reveal them to be young stellar objects (YSOs). The northern of the two exhibits a near-infrared tail, which is 15'' (0.15 pc) long in H and directed 66° away from the plume. Although the stars are exposed, as in Class II YSOs, the spectral energy distribution of the pair rises beyond 2 μm, typical of Class I systems. It appears that they are transitional YSOs, with characteristics similar to those of Holoea (IRAS 05327+3404). The total brightness of the plume plus disk exceeds that of the stars by 1.6 mag in I , yet the V - I color is bluer by only 0.50 mag. Thus, the nebula cannot be a consequence of reflection, even allowing for differential extinction. It is tentatively identified as a remnant of an outflow from a binary YSO, glowing from the photoluminescence of silicon nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→