MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989877676 · doi:10.1109/escience.2012.6404470

Web applications for experimental control at CLS

2012· article· en· W1989877676 on OpenAlex
Dong Liu, Dylan Maxwell, E. Matias

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersLaboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron
KeywordsCLs upper limitsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebWeb serviceWeb application

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advantages of web applications have already got attention in major physical research facilities like Canadian Light Source (CLS). It is the accessability of web applications that makes them preferred to native desktop application in some experimental control scenarios. This short paper presents two web applications that were mainly developed at CLS - Science Studio for remote access and collaboration of instruments and computation resources, and Logit for beamline experiment information management. These two applications represents two typical web applications. Science Studio is heavy-weight and provides a large spectrum of functionalities and has been developed by distributed teams for years. Logit is light-weight, and provides very limited set of features and was delivered in a very short time. The architectural designs are discussed for both sides, and the lessons learned from them are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it