A prediction-based active queue management for TCP networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of new kinds of applications and technologies (e.g., data-intensive applications, server virtualization) has led to a better utilization of the network resources. However, it has also led to more bandwidth consumption and more congestion especially inside data center networks. Thus, researchers are focusing again on TCP and Active Queue Management (AQM) mechanisms in order to better control congestion and to cope with application requirements in terms of end-to-end delay [1], [2], [3]. Recently, we proposed a new AQM mechanism (called α_SNFAQM) that uses traffic prediction to accurately detect future congestion and to proactively act upon it [4]. In this paper, we develop an analytical model to assess the effect of α_SNFAQM on TCP. The study proves that this AQM is efficient enough to stabilize queue size in routers/switches, and thereby allowing to control end-to-end packet delay. These results have been also validated by simulations for a topology with multiple bottleneck links. They show that α_SNFAQM outperforms other AQM schemes like RED, PAQM and APACE in stabilizing instantaneous queue length, while keeping a high utilization of the links and the same packet loss rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".