MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989921909 · doi:10.1021/ja041025r

Mathematica 5.1 Wolfram Research Inc., 100 Trade Center Drive, Champaign, IL 61820-7237. www.wolfram. com. Suggested retail price:  $1880 (U.S. and Canada) includes one year of premier service. Academic price:  $895. Student version:  $139.95.

2005· article· en· W1989921909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dmitrii E. Makarov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationComputer scienceLibrary scienceCenter (category theory)BenchmarkingWorld Wide WebMarketingChemistryBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVComputer Software Re...Computer Software ReviewNEXTMathematica 5.1 Wolfram Research Inc., 100 Trade Center Drive, Champaign, IL 61820-7237. www.wolfram. com. Suggested retail price: $1880 (U.S. and Canada) includes one year of premier service. Academic price: $895. Student version: $139.95.Dmitrii E. MakarovView Author Information University of Texas at AustinCite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16, 6134Publication Date (Web):March 31, 2005Publication History Published online31 March 2005Published inissue 1 April 2005https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja041025rhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ja041025rproduct-reviewACS PublicationsCopyright © 2005 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views93Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Algorithms,Benchmarking,Chemistry education,Elements,Software Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsFrench-language works237,207