MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989926752 · doi:10.3109/13814780009094320

Being a general practitioner: what it means

2000· article· en· W1989926752 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of General Practice · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Research and Practices
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)Medical diagnosisGeneral practicePsychoanalysisFamily medicinePathologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When I started in practice, the thing that gave me joy was the solving of clinical puzzles, the making of good diagnoses, thus impressing my colleagues. As time went on I found myself preoccupied more and more with the patients I had come to know. It was their joys and sorrows, their suffering and healing, that moved me. Of course, clinical diagnosis and management did not cease to be crucial: simply that a patient's illness or disability became interwoven with a life story. I came to see medicine as more complex, more context-dependent, more poignant, more a reflection of the human condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.007
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it