MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989944891 · doi:10.1517/14712598.8.7.1011

Adalimumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease

2008· review· en· W1989944891 on OpenAlexaff
Shane Devlin, Remo Panaccione

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Biological Therapy · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsCalgary General HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdalimumabInfliximabMedicineCrohn's diseaseMonoclonal antibodyDiseaseMonoclonalInternal medicineInflammatory bowel diseaseClinical trialImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of biologic therapy for Crohn's disease has revolutionized our approach to disease management and redefined our goals. Infliximab (Remicade), an intravenously delivered murine-chimeric monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha was released in 1998 and shown to have significant benefits in patients with refractory luminal and fistulizing Crohn's disease. Since then other anti-TNF strategies have undergone investigation with variable results. Adalimumab (Humira), a self administered, subcutaneous, fully human monoclonal antibody against TNF-alpha represents the next generation of therapy. It has demonstrated efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's in three large double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials. In addition it has demonstrated steroid-sparing properties and the ability to reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life. It is anticipated, given its clinical efficacy, its fully human nature, and the convenience of self administration that it will have a significant effect on the management of Crohn's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Biological TherapySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207