MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1989945707 · doi:10.1177/0951820706061457

Pseudepigrapha Notes I: 1. <i>Lunationes Danielis</i> ; 2. Biblical Figures outside the Bible

2005· article· en· W1989945707 on OpenAlexaff
Lorenzo DiTommaso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHebrewLiteratureHebrew BibleClassicsBibliographyHistoryThematic mapPhilosophyArtBiblical studiesLibrary scienceCartographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the first in a series of articles introducing (1) new texts or new copies of known texts from manuscripts, and (2) thematic updates to the Bibliography of Pseudepigrapha Research, 1850–1999. This article presents some new manuscript copies of the Lunationes Danielis (the lunar prognosticon attributes to the prophet Daniel) and a working bibliography of secondary sources on the apocryphal texts and traditions associated with .gures from the Hebrew Bible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for the Study of the PseudepigraphaSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207