Characterization of Visuoconstructional Disabilities in Patients With Probable Dementia of Alzheimer's Type
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to systematically examine alterations underlying the graphical copying performance of Alzheimer's patients at different stages of cognitive decline, in light of a theoretical framework of visuoconstructional processing (Guérin, Ska, & Belleville, 1999). Eight patients with a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease were studied. A group of 24 elderly subjects, of similar age to the patient group and slightly higher education, served as controls. The severity of the cognitive decline of each patient was measured with a standard neuropsychological battery. All subjects were administered a copying task and tasks measuring visual exploration, judgment of spatial relations and graphical planning. Group and individual results were analyzed. The group results suggested that visuoconstructional apraxia in patients with Alzheimer's type dementia is characterized by impaired visual exploration and judgment of spatial relations. Individual results revealed between-patient variability related to the severity of cognitive decline. Given the small number of patients, these observations need to be replicated with a larger-scaled study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it