MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990037707 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2014.6939000

A comparative study of VSC-OPF techniques for voltage security improvement and losses reduction

2014· article· en· W1990037707 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJacobian matrix and determinantControl theory (sociology)VoltageSingular valueElectric power systemReduction (mathematics)Power flowMinificationComputer scienceStability (learning theory)AC powerPower (physics)EngineeringMathematical optimizationMathematicsElectrical engineeringApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents and compares three voltage stability constrained optimal power flow (VSC-OPF) techniques for both voltage stability improvement and power losses minimization. The techniques are based on static voltage stability indices which provide important information about the proximity of the system to voltage collapse. The first one is a new concept based on the line voltage collapse proximity indicator (VCPI), the second utilizes the bus voltage stability indicator L-index and the last one focuses on the minimum singular value (MSV) of the power flow Jacobian matrix. The approaches are described in detail and evaluated on the IEEE 14-bus and 30-bus test systems, where their performances are compared under different operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207