Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early universe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We derive a general equation relating the gravitational-wave observables $r$ and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{0}^{\mathrm{gw}}(f)$; or the observables ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{0}^{\mathrm{gw}}({f}_{1})$ and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{0}^{\mathrm{gw}}({f}_{2})$. Here, $r$ is the so-called ``tensor-to-scalar ratio,'' which is constrained by cosmic-microwave-background experiments; and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{0}^{\mathrm{gw}}(f)$ is the energy spectrum of primordial gravitational waves, which is constrained, e.g., by pulsar-timing measurements, laser-interferometer experiments, and the standard big bang nucleosynthesis bound. Differentiating this equation yields a new expression for the tilt $d\mathrm{ln}{\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{0}^{\mathrm{gw}}(f)/d\mathrm{ln}f$ of the present-day gravitational-wave spectrum. The relationship between $r$ and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{0}^{\mathrm{gw}}(f)$ depends sensitively on the uncertain physics of the early universe, and we show that this uncertainty may be encapsulated (in a model-independent way) by two quantities: $\stackrel{^}{w}(f)$ and ${\stackrel{^}{n}}_{t}(f)$, where ${\stackrel{^}{n}}_{t}(f)$ is a certain logarithmic average over ${n}_{t}(k)$ (the primordial tensor spectral index); and $\stackrel{^}{w}(f)$ is a certain logarithmic average over $\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{w}(a)$ (the effective equation-of-state parameter in the early universe, after horizon re-entry). Here, the effective equation-of-state parameter $\stackrel{\texttildelow{}}{w}(a)$ is a combination of the ordinary equation-of-state parameter $w(a)$ and the bulk viscosity $\ensuremath{\zeta}(a)$. Thus, by comparing observational constraints on $r$ and ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{0}^{\mathrm{gw}}(f)$, one obtains (remarkably tight) constraints in the ${\stackrel{^}{w}(f),{\stackrel{^}{n}}_{t}(f)}$ plane. In particular, this is the best way to constrain (or detect) the presence of a stiff energy component (with $w>1/3$) in the early universe, prior to big bang nucleosynthesis. (The discovery of such a component would be no more surprising than the discovery of a tiny cosmological constant at late times!) Finally, although most of our analysis does not assume inflation, we point out that if cosmic-microwave-background experiments detect a nonzero value for $r$, then we will immediately obtain (as a free by-product) a new upper bound $\stackrel{^}{w}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.55$ on the logarithmically averaged effective equation-of-state parameter during the ``primordial dark age'' between the end of inflation and the start of big bang nucleosynthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".