Facteurs contribuant à l’identité du prêtre de pèlerinage de Prayāga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif premier de notre article est de cerner l’identité des prêtres de pèlerinage de Prayāga (Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, Inde). Cette identité est construite par la perception qu’entretiennent ces prêtres d’eux-mêmes, la perception de cette collectivité par autrui, les différentes fonctions et prescriptions déterminant leurs activités professionnelles, et les rapports qu’ils entretiennent avec les autres groupes sociaux. Nous discuterons de l’endogamie, de l’exclusivité de la profession, du commensalisme, des rites de perfectionnement ainsi que de certains éléments spécifiques au mode de vie des prayāgavāla qui unissent ces derniers aux pèlerins. Le présent article nous mènera à la conclusion que ces prêtres de pèlerinage constituent un groupe social relativement homogène et distinct dont l’identité est toujours fortement ancrée dans un schème traditionnel hindou.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".