MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990068836 · doi:10.1109/acc.2014.6858906

Robust distributed model predictive control of constrained continuous-time nonlinear systems using two-layer invariant set

2014· article· en· W1990068836 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaotao Liu, Yang Shi, Daniela Constantinescu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemModel predictive controlInvariant (physics)Bounded functionComputer scienceTrajectoryRobust controlMathematical optimizationMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the distributed model predictive control (MPC) of a group of dynamically decoupled nonlinear systems coupled by cost function. The communication topology features neighbor-to-neighbor information exchange of the assumed system state trajectory. The cooperation among dynamically decoupled nonlinear systems is promoted by including a coupling term in the cost function. A control strategy is designed based on the two-layer invariant set in order to handle the effect of the external disturbances. It is shown that by appropriately choosing the sampling interval, the recursive feasibility is guaranteed provided that the initial state is feasible and the disturbance is bounded by a certain level. Sufficient conditions are established such that all system states converge to their corresponding robust positively invariant sets. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified through a simulation example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207