An Integrated Modeling Approach for ANN-Based Real-Time Thermal Error Compensation on a CNC Turning Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermally induced errors play a critical role in controlling the level of machining accuracy. They can represent a significant proportion of dimensional errors in produced parts. Since thermal errors cannot totally be eliminated at the design stage, active errors compensation appears to be the most economical and realistic solution. Accurate and efficient modeling of the thermally induced errors is an indispensable part of the error compensation process. This paper presents an integrated and comprehensive modeling approach for real-time thermal error compensation. The modeling process is based on multiple temperature measurements, Taguchi’s orthogonal arrays, artificial neural networks and various statistical tools to provide cost effective selection of appropriate temperature variables and modeling conditions as well as to achieve robust and accurate thermal error models. The experimental results on a CNC turning center confirm the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed approach and show that the resultant model can accurately predict the time-variant spindle thermal drift errors under various operating conditions. After compensation, the thermally induced spindle errors were reduced from 19m to less than 1 m. The proposed modeling optimization strategy can be effectively and advantageously used for real-time error compensation since it presents the benefit of straightforward application, reduced modeling time and uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".