MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990085621 · doi:10.1121/1.1369097

Numerical modeling of finite-amplitude sound beams: Shock formation in the near field of a cw plane piston source

2001· article· en· W1990085621 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsDiffractionPhysicsPiston (optics)HarmonicsNonlinear systemNonlinear acousticsShock (circulatory)Frequency domainComputational physicsAmplitudeAcousticsOpticsMathematical analysisMathematicsWavefrontQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two theoretical models and the corresponding numerical codes for the description of nonlinear acoustic beams radiated from intense cw sources in water are presented. In the first model, diffraction effects are included using the Rayleigh integral, whereas nonlinearity and thermoviscous absorption are accounted for in a quasi-plane approximation. The simulations are performed in the time domain using the code previously developed for single-pulse propagation in medium having arbitrary frequency-dependent absorption. The second model is based on the Khokhlov–Zabolotskaya–Kuznetsov equation, which, contrary to the first model, accounts for diffraction in the parabolic approximation. The simulations are performed in the frequency domain using a novel algorithm that has been developed. A variable number of harmonics, which follows the nonlinear broadening of the wave spectrum are employed in the algorithm to speed up calculations. In order to prove the validity and the accuracy of the two codes developed, the simulation of diffraction and nonlinear effects in the near field of an intense ultrasound circular piston source in water is performed. The results of modeling obtained by both codes are compared with each other and with known experimental data, and are found to be in a good agreement. Frequency-domain code is then used for detailed study of the strongly nonlinear regime of propagation, when shocks are developed in the waveform close to the source. It is demonstrated that diffraction plays a major role in shock formation. Development of two shocks in each cycle and their further collision is predicted. It is also shown that nonlinear propagation and shock formation result at some distance in the two times excess of peak positive pressure in comparison with the maximum value obtained in the case of linear propagation. The beam total power decay due to formation of shocks as a function of the propagation distance is compared with the intensity in a plane wave propagation without diffraction. It is shown that nonlinear energy decay starts earlier for the beam, but decreases slower over longer distances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it