MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990138726 · doi:10.1002/jcb.20726

Purification and characterization of a novel mammalian endoribonuclease

2005· article· en· W1990138726 on OpenAlexaff
Kirk Bergstrom, Joel C. Urquhart, Alaeddin Tafech, Erin Doyle, Chow H. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndonucleaseRNAEndoribonucleaseMolecular biologyRNase PDNABiologyBiochemistryPolyadenylationRibonucleaseMessenger RNAEnzymeRNase HNuclease protection assayRNA-dependent RNA polymeraseChemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endonuclease-mediated mRNA decay appears to be a common mode of mRNA degradation in mammalian cells, but yet only a few mRNA endonucleases have been described. Here, we report the existence of a second mammalian endonuclease that is capable of cleaving c-myc mRNA within the coding region in vitro. This study describes the partial purification and biochemical characterization of this enzyme. Five major proteins of approximately 10-35 kDa size co-purified with the endonuclease activity, a finding supported by gel filtration and glycerol gradient centrifugation analysis. The enzyme is an RNA-specific endonuclease that degrades single-stranded RNA, but not double-stranded RNA, DNA or DNA-RNA duplexes. It preferentially cleaves RNA in between the pyrimidine and purine dinucleotides UA, UG, and CA, at the coding region determinant (CRD) of c-myc RNA. The enzyme generates products with a 3'hydroxyl group, and it appears to be a protein-only endonuclease. It does not possess RNase A-like activity. The enzyme is capable of cleaving RNAs other than c-myc CRD RNA in vitro. It is Mg(2+)-independent and is resistant to EDTA. The endonuclease is inactivated at and above 70 degrees C. These properties distinguished the enzyme from other previously described vertebrate endonucleases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207