MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990172071 · doi:10.7202/055761ar

La modernisation du Québec et la légitimité de l'État canadien

2005· article· fr· W1990172071 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Hubert Guindon

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les fondements de la crise actuelle de l'État canadien découlent de la modernisation de l'économie politique québécoise au cours de la Révolution tranquille. L'ascension d'une nouvelle classe moyenne a passé par l'élargissement du rôle de l'État provincial aux domaines des affaires publiques hier administrées sur une base locale et communautaire : les affaires sociales, la santé, l'éducation. Les perdants : le clergé francophone et les anglophones québécois, qui fondaient leur autonomie sur les institutions locales; l'alliance entre les marchands anglais et le clergé, scellée par le pacte confédératif, devient alors périmée. Par ailleurs, quand l'engorgement des secteurs étatiques réduit les possibilités d'absorption des nouvelles élites francophones, celles-ci se heurtent aux chasses gardées anglophones du secteur privé : la question de la langue fait alors brusquement surface sur la scène politique. Cette structure explique l'insignifiance de la politique des langues officielles et impose une renégociation des cadres fédéraux de l'État canadien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207