MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990211490 · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.016213

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∕</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>noise in a thin stochastic layer described by the discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation

2007· article· lv· W1990211490 on OpenAlexafffund
Carlos L. Pando Lambruschini, Eusebius J. Doedel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2007
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsPhase spaceNonlinear systemStefan problemPhysicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmStatistical physicsMathematicsBoundary (topology)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the nonlinear dynamics in a trimer, described by the one-dimensional discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation, with periodic boundary conditions in the presence of a single on-site defect. We make use of numerical continuation to study different families of stationary and periodic solutions in this Hamiltonian system. Taking into account a suitable Poincaré section, we are able to study the dynamics of a generic thin stochastic layer in this conservative system. Our results strongly suggest that intermittency, on the one hand, and transport between two almost invariant sets, on the other hand, are relevant features of the chaotic dynamics. This behavior arises as a result of the formation of the above mentioned stochastic layer connecting two hyperbolic fixed points of the Poincaré return map. We find that the transit times, the time intervals to traverse some suitable sets in phase space, generate 1/f noise. Its origin is explained in terms of a hopping mechanism in a suitable discrete state space of transit times. A qualitatively similar behavior is also found in the standard map, which shows the generic nature of this mechanism. As a physical application of our results, we consider a possible experiment in a ring of weakly coupled Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) with attractive interactions, where intermittent bursts of the relative phase of two spatially symmetric BECs take place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0990.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicNonlinear Photonic SystemsFrench-language works237,207