MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990231522 · doi:10.1080/00268970010020618

The weakly bound complex NH<sub>3</sub>-CO: Observation and analysis of spectra in the infrared (C-O stretching) and millimetre wave (76–106 GHz) regions

2001· article· en· W1990231522 on OpenAlexaff
Changhong Xia, Kaley A. Walker, A. R. W. McKellar

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Spectroscopy and Structure
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
Keywordsvan der Waals forceIntermolecular forceInfraredChemistrySpectral lineInfrared spectroscopyMoleculeMillimetre waveMicrowaveVan der Waals moleculeAtomic physicsCrystallographyMolecular physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The van der Waals complex NH3-CO has been studied in the infrared and millimetre wave regions, and analysed on the basis of the distinction between the ortho- and para- NH3-CO nuclear spin species. The spectrum and energy level pattern of ortho-NH3-CO are relatively simple, closely resembling those of the Ne-CO and Ar-CO complexes. The situation for para-NH3-CO is somewhat more complicated, with observed states having K values which differ by ±1 from that of the analogous orthoNH3-CO state. This indicates that the lowest energy orientation of para-NH3-CO in the complex lies in a II configuration. The present results correlate very well with the only previous study of NH3-CO, in the microwave region, and clarify the nature of the rotational series observed there. The infrared band centre of NH3-CO is only very slightly shifted (<0.2cm−1) from that of the free CO molecule, indicating that the CO vibration has little effect on the intermolecular forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PhysicsSame topicMolecular Spectroscopy and StructureFrench-language works237,207