Multi-provider service negotiation and contracting in network virtualization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Network virtualization environment (VNE) affords great business flexibility to the customers and the providers as multiple providers can jointly support a customer's virtual network. Under the current network model, a group of Infrastructure Providers (InPs) peer with each other to provide a packaged deal. Such a business arrangement is not customer-driven, does not promote fair market competition and does not ensure cost minimization. Furthermore, the on-demand nature of virtual networks requires efficient and automated service negotiation and contracting. In this paper, we present V-Mart. To the InPs, V-Mart offers an environment to participate in a faithful and fair competition over the VN resources; and to the SPs, it offers a customer-driven virtual resource partitioning and contracting engine. V-Mart uses a two-stage Vickrey auction model that is strategy-proof, flexible to diverse InP pricing models, and functions over heterogenous multi-commodity market that characterizes the NVE. Through analysis and simulation we show the flexibility and effectiveness of V-Mart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it