MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990267527 · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7522.966-e

Sports utility vehicles and older pedestrians

2005· letter· en· W1990267527 on OpenAlexaff
Ediriweera Desapriya, Ian Pike

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2005
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePedestrianHuman–computer interactionData scienceTransport engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chief determinants for the degree of severity of injuries in motor vehicle collisions are vehicle size and weight. If all cars were designed to be equal in standard to the best car currently available in each class, then an estimated half of all fatal and disabling injuries could be avoided. Sports utility vehicles (SUVs) differ from cars in three key areas: they have greater mass and stiffness and the geometry places bumpers above the frames of struck cars, resulting in higher intrusion when striking smaller cars. Thus the safety designs that were effective 10 or 15 years ago are not adequate in today's incompatible vehicle collisions. New technology needs to be developed and implemented. Although mass affects survival in crashes, good vehicle geometry and energy absorbing interfaces are important in developing a heavy vehicle that behaves in crashes like the average car.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0090.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicAutomotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsFrench-language works237,207