Fractionated (split dose) radiosurgery in patients with recurrent brain metastases: implications for survival
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radiosurgery is conventionally prescribed for brain metastases with a single dose of radiation. Fractionation has been advocated to improve tumour control. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors including fractionation has been performed in two consecutive prospective radiosurgery protocols with and without fractionation in order to identify an association, if any, between fractionation and survival. A surgically applied stereotactic head frame was used. Radiosurgery planning was based on a contrast-enhanced CT. Sixty-nine patients underwent the two-fraction regimen and 35 patients had a single treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of extracranial malignancy, performance status, multiple brain metastases, patient gender and the time from the initial treatment to radiosurgery were independent determinants for survival. Fractionation was also an independent determinant with two-fraction patients surviving a median of 30 weeks versus single fraction patients who survived a median of 16 weeks. Fractionated radiosurgery was associated with improved survival and deserves further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it