MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimal Power Allocation for Wideband Cognitive Radio Networks Employing SC-FDMA

2013· article· en· W1990308389 on OpenAlexaff
Peiran Wu, Robert Schober, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioWidebandComputer scienceInterference (communication)Frequency-division multiple accessOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessPower (physics)TransmitterConvex optimizationTransmitter power outputChannel allocation schemesPower budgetComputer networkMathematical optimizationOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringPower controlRegular polygonWirelessMathematicsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the optimal power allocation (OPA) strategy of secondary user (SU) transmitters in wideband cognitive radio networks employing single-carrier frequency-division multiple access (SC-FDMA). To protect the link of the primary user, we study two types of constraints on the SUs: Individual per-tone interference power constraints (IPCs) for each SU and a joint aggregate IPC across all frequency tones and users. Using tools from convex optimization, we derive the sum rate optimal OPA across frequency tones for the SU transmitters for both types of constraints. Simulation results show that the proposed OPA schemes can considerably improve the achievable sum rate of SC-FDMA based SU systems compared to equal power allocation and conventional power allocation schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207