ERRATUM: A rewiew of <i>Leidyosuchus canadiensis</i> Lambe, 1907 (Archosauria: Crocodylia) and an assessment of cranial variation based upon new material: Erratum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cranial morphology of Leidyosuchus canadensis Lambe 1907 is reviewed based on previously undescribed materialseven skulls and eight mandibles. This species can be distinctively diagnosed by more than 10 derived features. New information supports the contention that L. canadensis is the sole representative of Leidyosuchus, and indicates that it is very different from the other species previously assigned to this taxon. The membership of L. canadensis within Alligatoroidea is also demonstrated by new information revealed in this study. Ontogenetic and individual variation in the cranial anatomy of L. canadensis are documented. The contact of the premaxillarymaxillary suture with the incisive foramen is not diagnostic of the taxon; rather, it exhibits individual variation. Leidyosuchus is endemic to North America. There was no faunal interchange of crocodyliforms between North America and central Asia during the last two stages of the Late Cretaceous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".