MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990319600 · doi:10.1139/v04-049

RKR-type inversion of the diatomic energy shifts due to breakdown of the BornOppenheimer approximation

2004· article· en· W1990319600 on OpenAlexaffvenue
J. K. G. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorn–Oppenheimer approximationDiatomic moleculeChemistrySemiclassical physicsRydberg formulaHamiltonian (control theory)Atomic physicsKinetic isotope effectInversion (geology)MINDOReduced massQuantum mechanicsMoleculePhysicsDeuteriumIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The principal effects of the breakdown of the Born–Oppenheimer approximation on the vibration–rotation energies of a diatomic molecule can be represented by the expectation values of terms to order (me/Mi) in the effective Hamiltonian, where me is the electron mass and Mi is the mass of atom i. This paper examines the possibility of inverting these expectation values to obtain the correction functions as functions of the internuclear distance r, using a generalization of the semiclassical Rydberg–Klein–Rees method. It is shown that the correction functions are not completely determinable from the inversion, and the form of the determinable combinations is obtained.Key words: diatomic molecules, vibration–rotation energies, isotope effects, Born–Oppenheimer breakdown, Rydberg–Klein–Rees method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207