MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990323303 · doi:10.1145/1180639.1180785

Remote rendering and streaming of progressive panoramas for mobile devices

2006· article· en· W1990323303 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Richard W. Pazzi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)Mobile deviceSoftware walkthroughFrame rateVirtual realityComputer graphics (images)Volume renderingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Providing mobile devices with virtual environment walkthrough and real-time streaming movie playback capability is expected to have a profound impact to the entertainment-based applications, such as virtual guides, online gaming, and e-learning, just to name a few. However, it is well known that it is extremely difficult to render complex 3D scenes at interactive frame rates on thin mobile devices known for their lack of proper resources needed to process large volume of 3D virtual environment data. In order to provide virtual environment navigation on thin mobile clients, we propose a hybrid technique which combines both remote geometry rendering and streaming of warped images. In our approach, the server renders a partial panoramic view, which is based on the user's viewpoint and last movements. The server then warps the image's coordinates into cylindrical coordinates, and streams the images to the client device, which will progressively build the panoramic representation of the scene. Furthermore, in order to enhance streaming performance and quality of the interaction, we propose to use a rate control mechanism as well as a prediction of the user's movements within the virtual scene. In this paper we discuss our scheme for remote rendering and streaming of progressive panoramas for mobile devices, and present our experimental results we have obtained in order to validate our proposed technique. Our results indicate clearly that the proposed solution is able to achieve stable frame rates and throughput in error-prone wireless channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207