MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990324444 · doi:10.1109/aero.2008.4526425

A Novel Precoder Design for OFDM Receivers in Unknown Fading Channels

2008· article· en· W1990324444 on OpenAlexaff
Fumihiro Hasegawa, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis, Subbarayan Pasupathy

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - IEEE Aerospace Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingPairwise error probabilityEstimatorPrecodingFadingBit error rateChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceMean squared errorMinimum mean square errorAlgorithmUpper and lower boundsMathematicsElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsStatisticsEngineeringMIMO

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel precoder design for an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system using a channel estimator. First, an asymptotically tight approximation of the pairwise error probability (PEP) error with channel estimation error is presented and is shown to improve the existing upper bound of the PEP. Using the proposed approximation, a near-optimal power allocation scheme is derived and investigated and a new precoding scheme is introduced to improve the bit error rate (BER) performance of the receiver assisted by a minimum mean square error (MMSE) channel estimator. Both experimental and theoretical results included in this paper show improvement in the BER performance of a receiver with channel estimators utilizing the introduced precoder and power allocation scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - IEEE Aerospace ConferenceSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207