From Quaker to Upper Canadian: Faith and Community among Yonge Street Friends, 1801 – 1850 (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: From Quaker to Upper Canadian: Faith and Community among Yonge Street Friends, 1801 – 1850 Todd Webb (bio) Robynne Rogers Healey. From Quaker to Upper Canadian: Faith and Community among Yonge Street Friends, 1801 – 1850. McGill-Queen’s University Press. 2006. xxvi, 294. $75.00 Robynne Rogers Healey’s From Quaker to Upper Canadian is a concise study of the process of denominational formation on the western frontier of the nineteenth-century British Empire. Concentrating on the role of women and the family in the Quakers’ Yonge Street settlement, Healey throws new light on the religious, gender, and cultural histories of pre-Confederation English Canada. At the same time, she carefully situates the Yonge Street Quakers within their wider social and political contexts. It is an impressive performance. [End Page 281] From Quaker to Upper Canadian deals with two generations of Yonge Street Quakers and their efforts to maintain their position as God’s peculiar people – a group set apart from the rest of society by their beliefs and religious practices. Healy traces the rise and fall of this Quaker ideal of separateness through chapters focused on the roles of family and women in community building and the impact of religious discipline and education on the Quaker sense of self. She argues that the Yonge Street Quakers became fully integrated into Upper Canadian society during the second quarter of the nineteenth century. They participated in the political struggles against the colony’s Tory oligarchy in the 1830s, and by 1850 they had joined hands with other Upper Canadian Protestants in support of abolitionism and other causes. This transformation, Healey demonstrates, was the result of factors operating within the Quaker community and in Upper Canadian society in general. Demographic change was particularly important. The land around the formerly isolated Yonge Street settlement filled up with non-Quaker colonists during the 1810s and 1820s, forcing the Friends to deal regularly with people outside their faith group. Healy also stresses the disruptive potential of factionalism among the Quakers. Schisms in 1812 and 1828 tore apart both the church and the kin groups on which so much of Quaker life was based. Those internal conflicts also broke the hold of religious discipline over younger Quakers, who, with opposing groups competing for their allegiance, no longer saw the rules of the community as absolutes. In many respects, From Quaker to Upper Canadian is a model study. In a little under two hundred pages, Healey manages to re-evaluate the history of an entire religious denomination in Upper Canada. She achieves this considerable feat through a close reading of the available manuscript sources. Her discussion of the meaning of silence in the minutes of the Quaker meetings is particularly noteworthy. In the period before the schism of 1828, she demonstrates, growing dissension silenced the usually loquacious Quakers, for whom consensus and community were of paramount importance. Historians of Upper Canada will also want to pay close attention to Healey’s account of the rebellion of 1837. She provides the answer to an old riddle: why Quakers made up 40% of William Lyon Mackenzie’s followers during the march down Yonge Street. The young men who became rebels were not denying their identity as Quakers, Healey argues, much less repudiating it. Mackenzie’s Quaker supporters believed that it would take drastic measures to end the tyranny of Family Compact. They were willing to shoulder arms in the interest of what they saw as the greater political good of the colony, even if that meant overlooking one of the key tenets of their faith – pacifism. Healy is also careful to note that these were young men who had grown up in the midst of the external and internal [End Page 282] forces that shook the Yonge Street settlement to its foundations from the 1810s onward. They were not rigid in their adherence to the Quaker discipline; or, at least, they were not as rigid as their parents, who did not join the rebellion. Healey’s explanations, like her book as a whole, are never simplistic. For that reason alone, From Quaker to Upper Canadian deserves a wide audience. Todd Webb Todd Webb, Department of History, Laurentian University...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".