MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990361234 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.134522

Two-dimensional nature of superconductivity in the intercalated layered systems<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Li</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HfNCl</mml:mi></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Li</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ZrNCl</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:math>Muon spin relaxation and magnetization measurements

2004· article· lv· W1990361234 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. Ito, Y. Fudamoto, A. Fukaya, I. M. Gat-Malureanu, M. Larkin, Peter L. Russo, A. T. Savici, Yohei Uemura, Kevin Groves, Ronald Breslow, Ken‐ichi Hotehama, S. Yamanaka, P. P. Kyriakou, M. T. Rovers, G. M. Luke, Kenji Kojima

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2004
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Chemistry and Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsPhysicsSuperfluidityMagnetizationCuprateMuon spin spectroscopyMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report muon spin relaxation $(\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR})$ and magnetization measurements, together with synthesis and characterization, of the Li-intercalated layered superconductors ${\mathrm{Li}}_{x}\mathrm{HfNCl}$ and ${\mathrm{Li}}_{x}\mathrm{ZrNCl}$ with/without cointercalation of THF (tetrahydrofuran) or propylene carbonate. The three-dimensional superfluid density ${n}_{s}{/m}^{*}$ (superconducting carrier density/effective mass) as well as the two-dimensional superfluid density ${n}_{s2\mathrm{D}}{/m}_{\mathrm{ab}}^{*}$ [two-dimensional (2D) area density of superconducting carriers/ab-plane effective mass] have been derived from the $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ results of the magnetic-field penetration depth ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathrm{ab}}$ observed with external magnetic field applied perpendicular to the 2D honeycomb layer of HfN/ZrN. In a plot of ${T}_{c}$ versus ${n}_{s2\mathrm{D}}{/m}_{\mathrm{ab}}^{*},$ most of the results lie close to the linear relationship found for underdoped high-${T}_{c}$ cuprate (HTSC) and layered organic BEDT (bis(ethylenedithio)) superconductors. In ${\mathrm{Li}}_{x}\mathrm{ZrNCl}$ without THF intercalation, the superfluid density and ${T}_{c}$ for $x=0.17$ and 0.4 do not show much difference, reminiscent of $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ results for some overdoped HTSC systems. Together with the absence of dependence of ${T}_{c}$ on average interlayer distance among ZrN/HfN layers, these results suggest that the 2D superfluid density ${n}_{s2\mathrm{D}}{/m}_{\mathrm{ab}}^{*}$ is a dominant determining factor for ${T}_{c}$ in the intercalated nitride-chloride systems. We also report $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ and magnetization results on depinning of flux vortices, and the magnetization results for the upper critical field ${H}_{c2}$ and the penetration depth $\ensuremath{\lambda}.$ A reasonable agreement was obtained between $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ and magnetization estimates of $\ensuremath{\lambda}.$ We discuss the two-dimensional nature of superconductivity in the nitride-chloride systems based on these results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7590.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicInorganic Chemistry and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207