MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990377253 · doi:10.1080/10508414.2014.861201

North American<i>Ab Initio</i>Flight Training for Chinese Pilots: A Case Study on Selection

2014· article· en· W1990377253 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dorothy F. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aviation Psychology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges
Canadian institutionsNew Brunswick Community College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlight trainingAeronauticsTraining (meteorology)Selection (genetic algorithm)EngineeringAviation medicineFlight simulatorApplied psychologyMedical educationPsychologySimulationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicineGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article outlines a method for selecting pilot candidates for ab initio flight training at a North American flight training unit (FTU) serving the Chinese market. Over the past 4 years the FTU has developed and implemented a ground-school-based method of assessment and selection for Chinese candidates. The method was developed in response to the lack of reliable and affordable assessment materials available for flight training candidates whose first language was other than English. Development, implementation, and the effects of assessment on the early hours of Canadian ground school are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Aviation PsychologySame topicInternational Student and Expatriate ChallengesFrench-language works237,207