MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On finite additive 2-bases

2014· article· lv· W1990392078 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Habsieger

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCHIST-ERAAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a positive integer N N , a set B \mathcal {B} of integers from { 0 , 1 , … , N − 1 } \{0,1,\dots ,N-1\} is called an additive 2 2 -basis for N N if every integer n ∈ { 0 , 1 , … , N − 1 } n\in \{0,1,\dots ,N-1\} may be represented as the sum of 2 2 elements of B \mathcal {B} . We discuss the methods used to estimate the minimal size of an additive 2 2 -basis for N N . We provide new examples to enrich this survey, which give good bounds. For instance, we slightly improve on the current record, from 0.46972 0.46972 to 0.46906 0.46906 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207