Expression and hypoxic regulation of angiopoietins in humanastrocytomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major inducer of tumor angiogenesis and edema in human astrocytomas by its interaction with cognate endothelial-specific receptors (VEGFR1/R2). Tie1 and Tie2/Tek are more recently identified endothelial-specific receptors, with angiopoietins being ligands for the latter. These angiogenic factors and receptors are crucial for the maturation of the vascular system, but their role in tumor angiogenesis, particularly in astrocytomas, is unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that the angiopoietin family member Ang1 is expressed by some of the astrocytoma cell lines. In contrast to VEGF, Ang1 is down regulated by hypoxia. Ang2 was not overexpressed. Expression profiles of low-grade astrocytoma specimens were similar to those of normal brain, with low levels of Ang1, Ang2, and VEGF expression. Glioblastoma multiforme expressed higher levels of Angl, but not to the same degree as pseudopalisading astrocytoma cells around necrotic and hypoxic zones expressed VEGF, as shown in previous studies. Ang2 expression in the highly proliferative tumor vascular endothelium was also increased, as was phosphorylated Tie2/Tek. The expression profile of these angiogenic factors and their endothelial cell receptors in human glioblastomas multiforme was similar to that in a transgenic mouse model of glioblastoma multiforme. These data suggest that both VEGF and angiopoietins are involved in regulating tumor angiogenesis in human astrocytomas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".