MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990483375 · doi:10.4043/12141-ms

Roncador Field: Transport of P-36 and Installation of the Mooring System

2000· article· en· W1990483375 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carlos Cunha Dias Henriques, Marina Barbosa Fachetti

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPetrobras
KeywordsMooringMarine engineeringPropulsionShipyardEngineeringSubseaWater transportEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringShipbuildingArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes the transport and installation phases of the semi-submersible PETROBRAS 36, since the unit's depart from Davie shipyard in Canada, where the conversion had been undertaken, up to the hook-up of the mooring system in Roncador Field. The selection of dry transportation of P-36 from Canada to Brazil, using the heavy lift carrier Mighty Servant 1 from Dockwise, was driven by a combination of technical and strategic issues. A set of technical studies was performed to make this 32,700-ton heavy transport feasible, taking into account the risk factors involved in the operation. P-36 mooring system comprises 16 lines in taut leg configuration, using polyester ropes and Vertically Loaded Anchors (VLAs). The water depth at the anchor locations ranges from 1200 to 1520m. The installation of a mooring system of this size in such depths represented an enormous challenge. The irregular soil characteristics in Roncador where two subsea canyons converge near to the platform location presented an additional complication factor. Background Petrobras-36 Production Unit. The Spirit of Columbus semisubmersible platform was originally built as a drilling and production unit, able to process up to 100,000 bpd. Twelve mooring legs composed its original mooring system that was designed for a maximum water depth of 500m. The construction of the unit was concluded in 1994 but, up to 1996, when it was contracted by Petrobras and renamed to Petrobras-36, it had never operated. In order to operate in Roncador Field, located in Campos Basin, the Spirit of Columbus undertook an extensive upgrade, performed at Davie shipyard in Canada. The upgrade included the installation of new process facilities for 180,000 bpd of oil and 7,200,000 m3/d of gas and 24,000 m3/d water injection capacity and facilities for risers' support. Structural modifications to support new equipment and to comply with stability and buoyancy requirements were also executed. Paper OTC 12136 (Ref.3) gives an overview of Roncador development program and a detailed description of the platform upgrade is given in paper OTC 12140 (Ref. 4). Mooring System Upgrade. The water depth increase (from 500 to 1360m), the huge number of flexible risers supported by the Unit and the strong currents in Roncador resulted in the need to upgrade the Unit's mooring system to 16 legs. Following Petrobras specifications, the system was designed in a taut leg configuration, using polyester ropes 1800m long with a Minimum Break Load (MBL) of 1,000 tons. Project Design Mooring Ropes. The 1,800m polyester legs were divided in 3 segments in order to turn easier the operations with the ropes inside the Anchor Handling Vessels. The segments were supplied in different lengths, to enable the abandonment of the lines in buoys, after the pre-setting (see below). The ropes were designed including a surplus of 25% on top of the necessary Safety Factors to comply with eventual resistance losses during the Unit's lifetime. The amount of polyester to be purchased was enormous. So, Petrobras decided to split the purchase among three different suppliers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesFrench-language works237,207