Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome resulting from repeat bortezomib usage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bortezomib is a chemotherapeutic agent that acts via proteasome inhibition resulting in cellular apoptosis and inhibition of angiogenesis. Although widely accepted as treatment of multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, it has also been shown to be efficacious in a variety of solid tumours such as pancreatic and colonic. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neuroradiological syndrome characterised by vasogenic oedema involving the postero-occipital cortical and subcortical white matter resulting in visual disturbances, seizures and altered mental status. Although in most cases PRES is reversible with removal of the provoking condition or drug, if not appropriately recognised and treated it may lead to permanent and life-threatening sequelae such as intracerebral haemorrhage and ischaemic infarction. We report a case of PRES associated with bortezomib therapy and contrast it with four other previously reported cases. Recognition of this potentially severe neurological complication is important with the increasingly widespread use of bortezomib.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".