Proximal Tibial Fracture Stability With Intramedullary Nail Fixation Using Oblique Interlocking Screws
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical stability of oblique interlocking screws in supplementing intramedullary nail fixation of high proximal tibial fractures. DESIGN: In vitro experimental testing. SETTING Orthopaedic biomechanics laboratory, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Center. PARTICIPANTS: Ten paired fresh-frozen human cadaver tibiae. INTERVENTION: One tibia of each pair was randomized to be instrumented with an intramedullary nail (M/DN; Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana), while the other was stabilized with a 13-hole stainless steel lateral tibial head plate (Synthes AO/ASIF). Specimens were tested in varus-valgus (v/v), flexion-extension (f/e) and torsion, before and after a 2-cm gap osteotomy was performed in the proximal segment. Testing of the nailed tibiae was performed with and without oblique proximal screws. Bone density was physically determined by removing a core of trabecular bone from the distal end of each tibia following testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Biomechanical construct stability. RESULTS: The addition of the proximally placed oblique screws increased the stability of the nail construct in v/v by 50% (6.8 mm, P < 0.05), in f/e by 47% (7.2 mm, P < 0.05), and in torsion by 18% (3.0 degrees, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference observed between the stability of the intramedullary nail construct with oblique screws and the plated construct. Trabecular bone density had a significant effect in reducing stability (P < 0.05) in nail and plate fixation. CONCLUSION: The addition of oblique interlocking screws significantly improves the stability of a nailed proximal tibia fracture and provides comparable stability to a plate osteosynthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".