MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990500074 · doi:10.1139/p07-045

Experimental air-broadened line parameters in the\bm{ u}\textsubscript band of CH\textsubscriptD

2007· article· en· W1990500074 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Adriana Predoi−Cross, Shannon Brawley-Tremblay, Chad Povey, M. A. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersJet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsPhysicsSpectral lineAbsorption spectroscopyAtomic physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Quantum numberLine (geometry)Absorption (acoustics)Non-linear least squaresOpticsChemistryExplained sum of squaresQuantum mechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we report the first experimental measurements of air-broadening and air-induced pressure-shift coefficients for approximately 378 transitions in the ν 2 fundamental band of CH 3 D. These results were obtained from analysis of 17 room-temperature laboratory absorption spectra recorded at 0.0056 cm –1 resolution using the McMath–Pierce Fourier transform spectrometer located on Kitt Peak, Ariz. Three absorption cells with path lengths of 10.2, 25, and 150 cm were used to record the spectra. The total sample pressures ranged from 0.129 × 10 –2 to 52.855 × 10 –2 atm with CH 3 D volume mixing ratios of approximately 0.0109 in air. The spectra were analyzed using a multispectrum nonlinear least-squares fitting technique. We report measurements for air pressure-broadening coefficients for transitions with quantum numbers as high as J′′ = 20 and K = 15, where K′′ = K′ ≡ K (for a parallel band). The measured air-broadening coefficients range from 0.0205 to 0.0835 cm –1 atm –1 at 296 K. All the measured pressure-shift coefficients are negative and are found to vary from about –0.0005 to –0.0080 cm –1 atm –1 at the temperature of the spectra. We have examined the dependence of the measured broadening and shift parameters on the J′′, and K quantum numbers and also developed empirical expressions to describe the broadening coefficients in terms of m (m = –J′′, J′′, and J′′ + 1 in the Q P-, Q Q-, and Q R-branch, respectively) and K. On average, the empirical expressions reproduce the measured broadening coefficients to within 4.4%.PACS Nos.: 33.20.Ea, 39.30+w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207