A RAC Protein-binding Site in the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 of Pre-rRNA Transcripts from Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interdependence of steps in the processing of the eukaryotic preribosomal rRNA transcripts indicate that rRNA processing, at least in part, acts as a quality control mechanism to help ensure that only functional rRNA is incorporated into mature ribosomes. In search of structural components that underlie this interdependence, we have isolated a large protein complex or RAC that contains an independent binding site for all four of the transcribed spacers in the nascent pre-rRNA. In this study the RAC-binding site in the internal transcribed spacer 2 sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rRNA transcripts was identified, and the influence of this site on rRNA maturation was assessed. Modification exclusion analyses indicate that the protein complex interacts with a helical domain previously shown to contain features common to both the internal transcribed spacer 1 and the 3'-external transcribed spacer. Mutagenic analyses in vitro confirm an interaction with this sequence, and parallel analyses in vivo indicated a critical role in both the maturation of the rRNA components of the large subunit as well as the 18 S rRNA component of the small subunit. Hybridization analyses also indicated greatly elevated levels of unprocessed nascent RNA. These effects are contrasted with mutations in other regions of the secondary structure that resulted in some reduction of plasmid-derived mature rRNA but no elevated levels of the precursor molecules. The significance with respect to rRNA maturation and the interdependences in rRNA processing are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".