MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Witnessing the globalisation of medical education first‐hand

2009· editorial· en· W1990524387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kevin W. Eva

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Education · 2009
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingBlameSurprisePrerogativePsychologyMedia studiesPsychoanalysisLawAestheticsSociologySocial psychologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I, Kevin W Eva, couldn’t sleep. Only those of you who know me personally will know just how startling a sentence that is. I am the guy many travellers love to hate as I usually don’t worry about how I’ll cope with travelling long hours or crossing many time zones. Give me a seat in a sardine can of a turbulent plane or a bed in a noisy part of the city, allow me to close my eyes, and the amount of time it takes me to fall asleep can usually be counted in seconds. I consider it my one and only superpower. Yet here I am, sitting up in bed at 4.00 am in Islamabad, Pakistan without so much as a cricket’s chirp to blame for my restlessness. I’ve slept no more than 10 of the past 80 hours, but I still can’t seem to drift into slumber. I’m not a poet, a journalist, nor a philosopher, so I probably won’t be able to adequately capture the feelings that have my mind racing. Nor do I anticipate that the thoughts I’m going to express in this editorial will be considered particularly novel by the journal’s readership. In fact, I’m dreadfully worried about turning this editorial into a ‘tired’ cliché, but I hope you’ll allow me an editor’s prerogative to use this space on occasion to simply share a personal experience that I consider relevant to the Medical Education community. I was brought to Pakistan by my good friend and colleague Ara Tekian, Associate Professor, and Director of International Affairs for the Department of Medical Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Ara has been working over the past year with Professor Dr Umar Ali Khan, Associate Dean of the Riphah Academy of Research and Education at Riphah International University, to create a new International Conference on Medical Education. Today I heard Ara variously described by Umar and his colleagues as a pacemaker, a prod and a rope as he has played a major role in making this conference a reality while proving yet again that his personal reputation for being tireless is well deserved. It is clear, though, that the entire team here, including the administration, staff, students, government and the Pakistani Medical and Dental Council are equally dedicated to making this conference a success that will live beyond this first meeting. I can imagine many readers at this point thinking, ‘Yet another conference, you say?’ and drifting off to sleep themselves, but this one is different, not necessarily for its content or format, but for what it represents. We live in a world plagued by strife, a fact that is as apparent here as anywhere. At dinner tonight my colleagues (Ara, John Norcini from the Foundation for the Advancement of International Medical Education Research, and Brownie Anderson from the Association of American Medical Colleges) and I were repeatedly praised for the courage we showed in coming to this meeting. Attending and speaking at a conference like this is one of the last things I would consider courageous, but I do have to admit that the numerous people who doubted the wisdom of travelling to this part of the world at this point in history (myself included) and the vast number of vehicle barriers, armed guards, bomb checks and metal detectors we’ve encountered around the city make it clear that this is not a normal trip. I’m a sceptic, both by nature and by training. So, although I would never understate the very real conflict that’s gripping the region in and around Pakistan [which seems to have worsened since this editorial was written], I do think a degree of scepticism about the images portrayed in the media is healthy. Living near Toronto during the 2003 SARS outbreak allowed me to see first hand how different newsworthy stories can be from day-to-day life. The media cannot be blamed for that (at least, not all the time) as it’s their job to report on unusual happenings, but we can be blamed for forgetting that the images that typically make the news are by definition counter to the norm. The irony in this instance is that when we arrived in Pakistan we were bombarded by various media pundits covering the conference, all of whom wanted to know why we had come to Pakistan, what the conference would be able to achieve, and how the medical educators in the various countries represented could so easily overlook potential ideological or political barriers to share knowledge and ideas. As is his wont, John was most eloquent in answering such questions by pointing out that health professional education may be the ideal context within which to find common ground as, at a fundamental level, all societies strive for better health and that an obvious way to do that is to seek better selection, training and assessment strategies for those who provide health care. Throughout the 2-day meeting and pre-conference workshops, it became clear that many more similarities than differences exist between the issues facing Pakistani medical educators and those that challenge their international colleagues. Naturally, the order of priority is variable and we do need to guard against the dangers of globalising medical education,1 but at its root we all seem to be working toward the same goals, many of which arise from the same frustrations. Although I have been fortunate to attend many international meetings around the globe, my experience in Pakistan gave me a stronger appreciation of why medical education and medical education research have become so global in scope. Being a relatively small field that depends to a large extent on enthusiasm, dedication and innovation, it is essential that we prioritise co-operation and collegiality over and above competition. There is too little to be gained and too much to be lost by building walls between our countries, our institutions, or the various disciplines and professions working to improve health care through education. In 2007 this journal received submissions from 61 countries and it is my hope that this figure will continue to grow as more groups like the medical educators in Pakistan mobilise to strengthen the efforts of the entire country and, by doing so, strengthen medical education around the globe. The timing for doing so could not be better as there are so many new and exciting initiatives in medical education underway worldwide. In this issue alone, no less than four articles speak of issues of direct relevance to the global nature of medical education, highlighting challenges of communication,2, 3 the availability of resources,4 and the universality of issues such as abuse and harassment.5 To nurture and promote further efforts in sharing ideas, challenges and solutions globally, Medical Education has recently partnered with conferences in North America (the Canadian Conference for Medical Education), Europe (the Association for the Study of Medical Education) and Asia (the Asia Pacific Medical Education Conference) to enable the lessons learned through the work of medical educators to be disseminated more readily at a global level. Those who are not fortunate enough to attend each conference can, as of 2009, read the proceedings of those meetings in online supplements produced by our journal by visiting http://www.mededuc.com. One of the more exciting announcements made during the Pakistani conference I attended was that the Pakistani Medical and Dental Council will now begin to recognise medical education as a medical specialty, immediately raising the profile of medical educators and providing further incentive for them to engage in a deep level of scholarship. Less than 24 hours after that announcement was made, I sit here in my hotel room personally excited by the opportunity to witness and support such awakenings to the value of medical education and medical education research. And, with a timing that could not be more fitting, my alarm has just come on, indicating that it is now time for me to ‘wake up’ and go and enjoy another day of friendship and learning with and from our international colleagues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0170.015
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0130.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical EducationSame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207