MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990543489 · doi:10.2118/01-08-01

Mapping of the McMurray Formation for SAGD

2001· article· en· W1990543489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsGeologyOverburdenOil in placePetroleum engineeringLithologyContext (archaeology)PetroleumMining engineeringGeochemistryAsphaltPaleontologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The McMurray formation in north-eastern Alberta contains a substantial fraction of the world's currently identified oil resources. The areal extent of the deposit is in the order of 300 km north-south and 100 km east-west. It has been estimated(1) that over 40 billion barrels (6.35 × 109 m3) are potentially recoverable with steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) from dual well pairs. This is in addition to the substantial reserves already accessible from surface mining operations in locations with minimal overburden. The success of potential SAGD projects is greatly dependent upon the proper identification of regions with adequate pay, limited shale barriers, and controllable bottom water and/or top gas/water. The fluvial/estuarine nature of the formation greatly limits the predictability of trends when viewed in a local context. However, when regional behaviour is coupled with geostatistical techniques, an improved understanding of these critical parameters is possible. This paper applies a computerized log analysis technique to obtain the porosity, oil saturation and permeability from the McMurray formation utilizing digitized logs. Additional analysis is performed to obtain regions of effective net pay and other performance indices. This information is then presented through the use of regional mapping with a geostatistical approach. Introduction The Athabasca tar sand deposit is located in the northeast corner of Alberta, Canada. The major accumulation within this deposit is contained within the McMurray formation of early Cretaceous age. By various estimates, the OOIP of the McMurray formation exceeds 120 e09 m3 (750 billion bbls)(2). The commercial extraction projects currently operational in this region are based on surface mining techniques. However, only a small fraction of the resource is suitable for mining operations(2). The vast majority of the region is covered by overburden deposits that exceed any currently economic surface mining technique. These more deeply buried regions may prove to be amenable to the steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process or some variant(3). Several pilot/demonstration plants have shown promising results with this technology, originally developed by the Alberta Oil Sands Technology Research Authority (AOSTRA) for the underground test facility (UTF)(4). The intention of this paper is to provide an overview of some of the computerized mapping techniques that are applicable to determining the extent of the possible SAGD resource in the McMurray formation. Reservoir Requirements for SAGD The SAGD process consists of a pair of parallel horizontal wells with a 3 8 m vertical separation. During normal operation, steam is injected into the upper/injection well, while oil and steam condensate are produced from the lower/production well. The energy transferred from the condensing steam heats the formation, greatly lowering the viscosity of the oil. This enables the oil to flow via gravity to the underlying production well. The process appears to be quite robust from a theoretical perspective. The two principal governing factors, conduction heat transfer into the cold reservoir and gravity flow of fluid to the production well, are only moderately influenced by many reservoir characteristics. A number of previous studies have explored the theoretical range of applicability of the SAGD process to generic heavy oil reservoirs(5, 6).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it