Characterization of the Effects of Mutations in the Putative Branchpoint Sequence of Intron 4 on the Splicing within the Human Lecithin:cholesterol Acyltransferase Gene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously identified a point mutation (intervening sequence (IVS) 4: T --> C) in the branchpoint consensus sequence of intron 4 of the lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) gene in patients with fish-eye disease. To investigate the possible mechanisms responsible for the defective splicing, we made a series of mutations in the branchpoint sequence and expressed these mutants in HEK-293 cells followed by the analysis of pre-mRNA splicing using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction as well as LCAT activity assay. The results reveal that 1) the mutation of the branchpoint adenosine to any other nucleotide completely abolishes splicing; 2) the insertion of a normal branch site into the intronic sequence of the natural (IVS4-22c) or the branchpoint (IVS4-20t) mutant completely restores splicing; 3) the natural mutation can be partially rescued by making a single nucleotide change (G --> A) within the branchpoint consensus sequence; and 4) other single base changes, particularly around the branchpoint adenosine residue, significantly decrease the efficiency of splicing and thus enzyme activity. Surprisingly, the nucleotide transversion at the last position of the branchpoint sequence (i.e. IVS4-25a or -25g) results in a 2.7-fold increase in splicing efficiency. Therefore, these observations clearly establish the functional significance of the branchpoint sequence of intron 4 for the splicing of the human LCAT mRNA precursors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".