E26 leukemia virus converts primitive erythroid cells into cycling multilineage progenitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute chicken leukemia retroviruses, because of their capacity to readily transform hematopoietic cells in vitro, are ideal models to study the mechanisms governing the cell-type specificity of oncoproteins. Here we analyzed the transformation specificity of 2 acute chicken leukemia retroviruses, the Myb-Ets- encoding E26 virus and the ErbA/ErbB-encoding avian erythroblastosis virus (AEV). While cells transformed by E26 are multipotent (designated "MEP" cells), those transformed by AEV resemble erythroblasts. Using antibodies to separate subpopulations of precirculation yolk sac cells, both viruses were found to induce the proliferation of primitive erythroid progenitors within 2 days of infection. However, while AEV induced a block in differentiation of the cells, E26 induced a gradual shift in their phenotype and the acquisition of the potential for multilineage differentiation. These results suggest that the Myb-Ets oncoprotein of the E26 leukemia virus converts primitive erythroid cells into proliferating definitive-type multipotent hematopoietic progenitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".