MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990577054 · doi:10.1002/rob.10030

Bilateral parallel force/position teleoperation control

2002· article· en· W1990577054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Robotic Systems · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleoperationDecoupling (probability)Control theory (sociology)Position (finance)Position trackingControl engineeringController (irrigation)Haptic technologyControl systemEngineeringComputer scienceSimulationControl (management)ActuatorArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The extension of parallel force/position control to teleoperation systems is considered in this article. In the proposed four‐channel bilateral controller, higher priority is granted to position control at the master side and to force control at the slave side. The primary goal of this control architecture is the enhancement of force and position tracking performance in the presence of uncertainties in the system and environment. The stability and performance of the proposed controller is investigated by analyzing the three decoupled single‐degree‐of‐freedom systems obtained from decoupling and projecting the closed‐loop system dynamics onto the slave task‐space orthogonal directions. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvement in transparency. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it