MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990587562 · doi:10.1115/1.4024146

Mixing Evaluation of a Passive Scaled-Up Serpentine Micromixer With Slanted Grooves

2013· article· en· W1990587562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicromixerReynolds numberMechanicsAdvectionFlow visualizationMixing (physics)VortexMaterials scienceFlow (mathematics)PhysicsTurbulenceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel, passive, scaled-up micromixer based on fluid rotation is proposed and evaluated experimentally and numerically over Reynolds numbers ranging from 0.5 to 100. Flow visualization is employed to qualitatively assess flow patterns, while induced fluorescence is used to quantify species distribution at five locations along the channel length. Two individual fluids are supplied to the test section via a Y-inlet. The fluid enters a meandering channel with four semicircular portions, each of which is lined with nine slanted grooves at the bottom surface. The main mixing channel is 3 mm wide and 0.75 mm deep, with a total length of 155.8 mm. Numerical simulations confirm rotation at all investigated Reynolds numbers, and the strength of rotation increases with increasing Reynolds number. Grooves are employed to promote helical flow, while the serpentine channel structure results in the formation of Dean vortices at Re ≥ 50 (Dean number ≥ 18.25), where momentum has a more significant effect. A decreasing-increasing trend in the degree of mixing was noted, with an inflection point at Re = 5, marking the transition from diffusion dominance to advection dominance. The increase in interfacial surface area is credited with the improved mixing in the advection-dominant regime, while high residence time allowed for significant mass diffusion in the diffusion-dominant regime. Good mixing was achieved at both high and low Reynolds numbers, with a maximum mixing index of 0.90 at Re = 100.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it