MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pulmonary gas exchange in the morbidly obese

2008· review· en· W1990598125 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObesity Reviews · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorbidly obeseMedicineBody mass indexRespiratory exchange ratioWeight lossCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressureAnesthesiaObesitySurgeryHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The literature on pulmonary gas exchange at rest, during exercise, and with weight loss in the morbidly obese (body mass index or BMI > or = 40 kg m(-2)) is reviewed. Forty-one studies were found (768 subjects weighted mean = 40 years old, BMI = 48 kg m(-2)). The alveolar-to-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference (AaDO2) was large at rest in upright subjects at sea level (23, range 5-38 mmHg) while the arterial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) was low (81, range 50-95 mmHg). Arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) was normal. At peak exercise (162 W), gas exchange improves. Weight loss of 45 kg (BMI = -13 kg m(-2)) over 18 months is associated with an improvement in PaO2 (by 10 mmHg, range 1-23 mmHg), a reduction in AaDO2 (by 8 mmHg, range -3 to -16 mmHg), and PaCO2 (by -3 mmHg, range 3 to -14 mmHg) at rest. Every 5-6 kg reduction in weight increases PaO2 by 1 and reduces AaDO2 by 1 mmHg, respectively. Morbidly obese women have better gas exchange at rest compared with morbidly obese men which is likely due to lower waist-to-hip ratios in women than from differences in weight or BMI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it