Coronary Endarterectomy with Beating Heart in Patients with Diffuse Atheromatous Coronary Artery Disease and Poor Ventricular Function: Early and Midterm Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed our experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary artery endarterectomy in patients with severely reduced left ventricular function and diffuse atheromatous coronary artery disease to evaluate the early and midterm results. METHODS: Between July 1998 and March 2004, 42 patients underwent off-pump myocardial revascularization with coronary artery endarterectomy. The mean age (+/-SD) for the 28 male and 14 female patients was 59 +/- 10.2 years. Twenty-seven patients (64.2%) had experienced a previous myocardial infarction, and 11 (26.2%) had undergone an operation on an emergency basis. All patients had an ejection fraction of less than 30%. The left anterior descending coronary artery was the most endarterectomized vessel (75% of patients). RESULTS: There were 5 early deaths (11%). Twenty-five (67.6%) of the surviving patients were symptom free, and 8 were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society classes II to IV. The ejection fraction improved after the operation in the 30 patients (71.42%) who underwent echocardiographic control and coronary angiography. The 28.4-month patency rate of the endarterectomized coronary arteries was 89%. The patency rates were 93.3% for the left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending coronary artery and 88.8% for the right coronary artery. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show increased operative mortality and morbidity in patients requiring coronary artery endarterectomy. However, the early results and particularly the midterm survival rates, clinical status, and continued graft patency justify off-pump coronary artery endarterectomy in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function and diffuse coronary artery disease. Many of these patients have disease that would otherwise be inoperable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".