MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990635029 · doi:10.1109/icc.2014.6883737

iCARII: Intersection-based connectivity aware routing in vehicular networks

2014· article· en· W1990635029 on OpenAlexaff
Nizar Alsharif, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceVehicular ad hoc networkRouting protocolNetwork packetOverhead (engineering)Wireless ad hoc networkIntersection (aeronautics)WirelessTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) has been gaining the attention from the academic and industry communities due to the promising applications in road safety, traffic management and passenger comfort. However, the short vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication range and the nature of vehicle mobility impose many challenges in packet routing and, accordingly, infrastructure-based applications, e.g., Internet access. For more reliable communication, automobile manufacturers have started the investigation to deploy cellular networks, such as LTE, to support in-car Internet access. In addition to the high communication cost to the end-user, using centric cellular networks for vehicular communication applications causes data explosion and network overload. A feasible solution is using VANETs for mobile data offloading when connectivity to infrastructure is guaranteed, which requires an efficient routing protocol with global connectivity awareness. In this paper, we propose a novel infrastructure-based, dynamic, and connectivity-aware routing protocol, iCARII, to enable infotainment applications and Internet access in an urban environment. iCARII aims to improve VANETs routing performance by enabling selecting roads with guaranteed connectivity and reduced delivery delay. Detailed analysis and simulation-based evaluations of iCARII demonstrate the significant improvement of VANET performance in terms of packet delivery ratio and end-to-end delay with a negligible cost of routing overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207