MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990697421 · doi:10.1109/fpt.2014.7082760

Approaching overhead-free execution on FPGA soft-processors

2014· article· en· W1990697421 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Eric LaForest, Jason H. Anderson, J. Gregory Steffan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratixComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayParallel computingOverhead (engineering)Soft errorRegister fileMicroarchitectureComputationReduction (mathematics)Embedded systemControl flowInterleavingClock rateComputer hardwareInstruction setChipEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Implementing systems on FPGA soft-processors, rather than as custom hardware, eases and accelerates the development process, but at the cost of a great reduction in performance. Orthogonal to limitations in parallelism or clock frequency, this reduction in performance primarily originates in the intrinsic addressing and flow-control overheads of scalar microprocessors, which expend a considerable number of cycles interleaving address calculations and branch decisions within the actual useful work. We present an improved FPGA soft-processor architecture which statically overlaps "overhead" computations and executes them in parallel with the "useful" computations, significantly reducing the number of processor cycles needed to execute sequential programs, while reducing maximum clock frequency to 0.939x of its original value. In addition to eliminating almost all overhead computations, the proposed soft-processor can operate at 500 MHz on the Altera Stratix IV FPGA - 0.909x of the absolute maximum rating. Combined, the high speed and execution efficiency increase the range of FPGA designs amenable to soft-processors rather than custom hardware. We evaluate our cycle count improvements with multiple benchmarks, achieving speedups ranging from 1.07x for control-heavy code, to 1.92x for looping code, never performing worse than the original sequential code, and always performing better than a totally unrolled loop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207