MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990730909 · doi:10.1175/jas3994.1

On the Dynamic Interpretation of the Virtual Temperature

2007· article· en· W1990730909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsAccelerationMechanicsInterpretation (philosophy)PhysicsThermodynamicsComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceStatistical physicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of virtual temperature is reviewed and extended into the definition of the dynamic virtual temperature, which is the temperature that a parcel of dry air should have in order to experience the same acceleration as a parcel of cloud air. It is obtained from the equations of motion and depends on the water content in the three thermodynamic states: vapor, liquid, and solid. The scale analysis of the equation of the dynamic virtual temperature shows that the terms due to the acceleration and phase transitions of the particles are negligible with respect to the terms depending on gravity. Therefore, even though conceptually more adequate, the approximate mathematical expression of the dynamic virtual temperature is practically identical to the conventional definition of virtual temperature accounting for water loading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it