MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990731425 · doi:10.1021/ie100462t

Glycerol Steam Reforming over Bimetallic Co−Ni/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>

2010· article· en· W1990731425 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilRyerson University
KeywordsCatalysisBimetallic stripChemistrySteam reformingGlycerolAdsorptionReactions on surfacesChemisorptionActivation energyInorganic chemistryWater-gas shift reactionReaction ratePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryHydrogen production

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycerol steam reforming has been performed in a fixed-bed microreactor containing bimetallic Co−Ni/Al 2 O 3 catalyst using a wide range of steam-to-glycerol ratios (3 ≤ STGR ≤ 12) for reaction temperatures between 773 and 823 K at atmospheric pressure. Physicochemical characterization revealed the presence of both Lewis and Brönsted acid sites on the catalyst although the catalyst appears to have a net surface acidity (acid:basic site concentration ratio = 9.0). Co and Ni oxides as well as the metal aluminates were identified from XRD pattern with crystallite size (131.5 nm) similar to that obtained from H 2 chemisorption experiments (136.0 nm). Glycerol consumption rate data analysis implicates fractional orders with respect to both glycerol (0.25) and steam (0.36) with an activation energy of 63.3 kJ mol −1 . Similar treatment for H 2, CO 2, CO, and CH 4 production rate evinced positive fractional orders for both reactants with the exception of CO which has mild inhibition by steam (−0.065). Mechanistic considerations and associated Langmuir−Hinshelwood and Eley−Rideal kinetic models were derived for both single- and dual-site adsorption modes. However, statistical discrimination as well as thermodynamic evaluation of the associated parameter estimates suggest that the most adequate representation involved molecular adsorption of glycerol and steam on two different sites with surface reaction as the rate-controlling step consistent with the presence of both Brönsted acid and basic sites on the catalyst. Carbon deposition during reaction appeared to be responsible for the loss in surface area and pore volume of the used catalysts. However, these attributes were nearly recovered after regeneration (>90%) using TPR−TPO−TPR−TPO cycles. Significantly, carbon deposition is a strong function of glycerol partial pressure but somewhat insensitive to the presence of steam, suggesting that the carbon residue was probably unreactive with steam under the reaction conditions. Indeed, temperature-programmed heat treatment (TPO−TPR−TPO−TPR and TPR−TPO−TPR−TPO) revealed at least two types of carbonaceous deposits. However, one of these carbon pools was resistant to removal with H 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it