MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990733967 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2013.6647059

Maximum power point tracking algorithm with advanced state detection and regression method for small wind energy systems

2013· article· en· W1990733967 on OpenAlexaff
Joanne Hui, Alireza Bakhshai, Praveen Jain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind speedWind powerTransient (computer programming)Control theory (sociology)Computer sciencePower (physics)Maximum power principleTracking (education)Energy (signal processing)RegressionSet (abstract data type)Maximum power point trackingPoint (geometry)Regression analysisElectric power systemOscillation (cell signaling)AlgorithmState (computer science)Rotational speedSteady state (chemistry)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learningStatisticsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A maximum power point (MPP) tracking algorithm that uses advanced state detection (ASD) and regression analysis (RA) is proposed in this paper. The ASD and RA allow quick and accurate extractions of the system's MPPs with minimal training and oscillation around the MPP. The ASD measures, stores, and analyses sets of the wind systems' rotational speed and power data to identify steady state operation, trends, and wind speed changes. The ASD therefore enables the algorithm to distinguish between meaningful measurements and misleading transient data. The RA utilizes a database of MPPs that is initially populated during the training phase using “perturb & observe” (P&O). The RA requires a small data set to build the regression model of the wind system's maximum power curve. Operating points are determined relative to the model and always progresses towards the MPP regardless of wind speed changes. Performance of the proposed solution is verified through simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207